top of page

Pre-Prints

​​

  • De Freitas, Oğuz-Uǧuralp, Z., Uǧuralp, A. K., & Puntoni, S. Why most resist AI companions. SSRN.

  • De Freitas, Oğuz-Uǧuralp, Z., Uǧuralp, A. K. Emotional manipulation by AI companions. arXiv.

  • Bentley, K., Van Ark, E., De Freitas, J., Hahn, T., Jacobson, N. C., Vasan, N., Whiteside, U., Belli, L., Gierenger, J., Zhao, N., Brown, M., Chekround, A. M., Hawrilenko, M. Benchmarking the safety of general-purpose large language models for suicide risk detection and response. SSRN.

  • Cachia, J. Y. A., Zhao, X., Pu, W., Liao, C., Keijsers, J., Fortgang, R. G. AI-powered early intervention for depression and anxiety: A randomized clinical trial. PsyArXiv.

2026

​​

  • De Freitas, J. Uǧuralp, A. K., Uǧuralp, Z. O., & Puntoni, S. (conditionally accepted). The effect of AI companion voice on loneliness. Nature Human Behavior.

  • De Freitas, J., Israeli, A., Nave G., Timoshenko, A., & Toubia, O. (invited). Innovating with generative AI: A psychological bottleneck framework. International Journal of Research in Marketing. SSRN

  • De Freitas, J. (2026). Your chatbot will define your brand: As conversational interfaces begin to dominate the customer experience, relationship design becomes a strategic priority. Harvard Business Review (magazine). 

  • De Freitas, J. (2026) AI companions as hyper attachment and caregiving targets. Current Opinion in Psychology. arXiv

  • De Freitas, J., Israeli, A., Nave G., Timoshenko, A., & Toubia, O. (2026). The innovation problems AI can't solve. Harvard Business Review (digital)

  • De Freitas, J., Castelo, N., Uǧuralp, A. K., & Oğuz-Uǧuralp, Z. (2026). Mourning the loss of AI companions. Nature Human Behavior

  • De Freitas, J., Huang, Y., & Pinker, S. (2026). Recursive mentalizing and public salience in the perception of common knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

  • Cohen, G., & De Freitas, J. (2026). Mitigating suicide risk for minors involving AI chatbots. JAMA.

  • Cachia, J., Zhao, X., Hunter, J., Wu, D., Lin, E., and De Freitas, J. (2026). AI for proactive mental health: A multi-institutional, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial. New England Journal of Medicine AI.

  • Paul, L. A., Mills, T., Ullman, T. E., De Freitas, J., Colas, F., & Tenenbaum, J. (2026). Reverse-engineering the centered self. Psychological Review.

2025

2024

​​

2023

2022

  • Prinzing, M., De Freitas, J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021). The ordinary concept of a meaningful life: The role of subjective and objective factors in attributions of meaning. Journal of Positive Psychology.  

2021

  • De Freitas, J., Censi, A., Smith, B. W., Di Lillo, L., Anthony, S. E., & Frazzoli, E. (2021). From driverless dilemmas to more practical common-sense tests for automated vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [supp. materials]

  • De Freitas, J., & Cikara, M. (2021). Deliberately prejudiced self-driving vehicles elicit the most outrage. Cognition. [supp. materials]

  • Tarhan, L., De Freitas, J., & Konkle, T. Behavioral and neural representations en route to intuitive action understanding. Neuropsychologia [supp. materials]

  • Gan, C., Schwartz, J., Alter, S., Schrimpf, M., Traer, J., De Freitas, J., Bhandwaldar, A., Sano, M., Kim, K. H., Wang, E., Mrowca, D., Lingelbach, M., Curtis, A., Feigelis, K., Haber, N., Gutfreund, D., Cox, D., DiCarlo, J., McDermott, J., Tenenbaum, J., Yamins, D. L. K. ThreeDWorld: A Platform for interactive, multi-modal physical simulation. Neural Information Processing Systems. [http://www.threedworld.org/]

2020

​​​​

2019

  2018

  2017

  2016

  • De Freitas, J.*, Thomas, K. A.*, DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. (2016) Recursive mentalizing and common knowledge in the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 621–629.

  • De Freitas, J., Myers, N. E., & Nobre, A. C. (2016). Tracking the changing feature of a moving object. Journal of Vision, 16(3), 1–21.

  2015

  • Newman, J. E., De Freitas, J., and Knobe, J. (2015). Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 96–125.

  2014

 

 

    bottom of page